Credit card company Visa is calling for a ban on the surcharge fee some merchants charge card-paying consumers at the point of sale.

The Commerce Commission was undertaking a review of card charges, and considering cutting the regulated interchange fee card companies can charge banks by as much as 75 percent, for example.

Card interchange fees were in turn passed on by banks to merchants at whatever rate the merchant can negotiate, meaning that some pay much more than others.

  • Joe :tinoflag:
    link
    fedilink
    17 days ago

    @Dave @TagMeInSkipIGotThis , I’m wondering about the legality of that as well plus I would tell them that I boycott them because of it.
    As for surcharges, imho they’re a blatant rip off, any business surely has all their costs already calculated into the price of their wares.

    • @[email protected]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      17 days ago

      I presume such a large outfit (Mojo has maybe… 20 stores? More?) they would have got legal advice.

      I see surcharges differently. Credit cards are an easily calculable cost to the business, and a service they are not required to offer.

      It’s a service. I think it’s perfectly reasonable to charge for it, given it’s an actual and easily calculated cost to the business.

      Not that long ago, credit was not available in as many places. It was very common for smaller places to accept EFTPOS and not credit. These days, I go to the local farmer’s market and can pay with a credit card if I choose to accept the surcharge. If we ban surcharges, we aren’t going to go to a world where it’s built into prices, we will go back to a world where credit is not as widely available. I’d argue that this world where people can use it if they accept the higher cost is a better model.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        26 days ago

        Seemingly large doesn’t necessarily mean well run. A long time ago I worked for an outfit that had around a dozen shops in one city and near half a dozen or so in others and given some of the things going on I can’t imagine they bothered getting legal advice for much other than loans :)

        • @[email protected]OPM
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          They probably googled it, hopefully they didn’t get a Gemini answer.

          For this specific case of cash, I’m curious as to if it were ever a (legal) problem to not accept cash.

          As far as I can tell, you legally have to take cash for payment of debts. Someone owes you money, you can’t refuse to take their payment in cash (yes I’m curious what happens if you show up with a million $1 coins to pay off your mortgage).

          When going to a shop, the shop is making a proposal (say, they will give you coffee if you give them $5) and you can accept or decline that offer (or negotiate by making your own offer). If the shop’s proposal is that you give them $5 paid for by EFTPOS/credit, and they will give you coffee, then I can’t see how that would break any laws so long as you are free to decline their offer.

          Of course it’s possible there could be a specific law targeting this case, but I can’t see how such a law would come about prior to now.