• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    30920 days ago

    Yes, keep making enemies of the billionaires that got this administration into office and spent millions of dollars to do so. I’d very much love that for you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13020 days ago

      Good thing this isn’t a country that came about because a bunch of rich white dudes got tired of being taxed and started a revolution.

      • ggppjj
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        That’s possibly reframing “no taxation without representation” a bit but I don’t entirely disagree with the sentiment.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1720 days ago

          They thought funding Trump would get them representation. They were wrong. Trump cares about no one but himself.

          • Geetnerd
            link
            fedilink
            English
            220 days ago

            Why would they care about “Representation?”

            They have more wealth than 1,000 people could ever spend in 1,000 lifetimes.

            He backed down to keep profits from MAGA Cult Members flowing in.

            Because being that greedy is a mental illness.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              15
              edit-2
              20 days ago

              So, he could have paid other guys to fight the war and stayed home? Instead of being in the middle of the battles, and going cold and hungry in Valley Forge?

              There’s a lot of bad things you can say about Washington but enough good to at least make him complicated. He chose to limit his own Presidency, the opposite of our wannabe Führer. for one.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                920 days ago

                Well, his wealth wasn’t exactly liquid, it was mostly tied up in wilderness land.

                Fortunes in those days weren’t in bank accounts, or stocks, or index funds, etc. They tended to be tied up in assets like land, slaves, crops, etc., and cold hard cash/gold, stored in a box somewhere, like under the floor.

              • Geetnerd
                link
                fedilink
                English
                720 days ago

                Yes, he was filthy rich, not in liquidity, but in assets.

                But yes, he was approached with the offer to be King of The Colonies, and he refused. We can admire that.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                319 days ago

                The modern technology of satelites, phones and such werent around back then, so any general wouldn’t be an effective one if they werent on the front lines with their soldiers.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  19 days ago

                  Yes, he chose to join the battle and become a General rather than sit out the war at Monticello. It’s not like he was ambitious to become the leader of the new country. He felt a sense of responsibility.

            • Geetnerd
              link
              fedilink
              English
              420 days ago

              He was one of the richest Americans who ever lived. I don’t if that is still true, but it was at one time.

        • Geetnerd
          link
          fedilink
          English
          120 days ago

          How are billionaires being taxed unfairly, and without “Representation,” when they own our politicians?

          • ggppjj
            link
            fedilink
            English
            219 days ago

            I don’t know, I don’t see anyone saying that here.

              • ggppjj
                link
                fedilink
                English
                419 days ago

                I really don’t understand the aggression, I was talking about the old rich dead people propaganda concerning no taxation without representation 200 years ago, I never said anything about the fuckwads we have today.

                If you think I’m saying something different, explain what you read and allow me the opportunity to clarify my intent.

                Saying I’m full of shit at this point is just asinine.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          720 days ago

          In the most literal sense we have representation, but it sure as hell doesn’t seem like it in practice… :(

          • Geetnerd
            link
            fedilink
            English
            320 days ago

            Not anymore.

            Watch the Republican Town Halls of the few who still have the courage, or narcissism, to hold, and even though they’re being booed down, they still have the arrogance to try the lecture their constituents.

            I think they’re trying to instigate riots so they can declare Martial Law via The Insurrection Act.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            720 days ago

            Literal only in the terminological sense. We elect “representatives” but they don’t actually represent us in any meaningful way.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          220 days ago

          When elections are fraudulent, its the same as no representation. Besides, pretty soon they’ll be suspending elections altogether. It doesn’t get more “no representation” than that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      820 days ago

      He’s brought down Tesla (bankrupt in 2 years, MMW), and now Amazon. We shpuld start a betting pool for who-s next. META? Google? Microsoft?

      • Geetnerd
        link
        fedilink
        English
        220 days ago

        None of those Mega Corps are going anywhere.

        They have virtually unlimited wealth. Amazon makes most of it’s money off of their server business.

        Tesla, on the other hand, has always been smoke and mirrors. Good riddance. If you have their stock, sell now.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          420 days ago

          Wouldn’t that be wonderful? Those corporations are what helped this “voting” travesty into power.

          Corporations don’t have peoples’ well being in their sights except as target practice.

          Power to the people, not corporations.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3720 days ago

      The billionaires have thus far been too cheap to amass private armies to directly enforce their own will. Why, when you can lobby Congress for the price of a used Hyundai Sonata to get the Army to do what you want?

      The government holds the power of violence and Trump holds the power of the government. The billionaires will be reminded of that if they get out of line. Coincidentally, this is the arrangement of modern Russia.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1820 days ago

        they have been too cheap thus far.

        I’m pretty sure that Bezos had enough money to bribe moderate chunks of the army.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1620 days ago

          Personnel is one thing.

          Modern warfighting is outrageously expensive. Guided munitions can cost hundreds of thousands each. Armored vehicles cost millions. Combat aircraft, tens of millions. And it continues to cost tons of money just to keep them in a bunker ready to go.

          They will balk at the cost of owning/operating even a single Arleigh-Burke destroyer.

          There is a reason they’re all too happy to keep letting you and me indirectly fund their military aspirations through taxes.

          • The Quuuuuill
            link
            fedilink
            English
            920 days ago

            this is part of why it’s important for everyone to pay attention to the asymmetric warfare being conducted in Ukraine. for one, it’s a genocide, don’t look away and speak for their liberation just like i hope everyone is speaking up for all colonized peoples, like Mayans, Darfurians, Congolese, Palestinians, and Uyghers. for another the skills demostrated may become necessary in the near future

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            320 days ago

            They will balk at the cost of owning/operating even a single Arleigh-Burke destroyer.

            They don’t need one. They need a sniper.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            520 days ago

            You can have all the expensive equipment you want. They don’t have the numbers. When your enemies are all around you and this military historically fucking sucks at combating insurgency, you’re going to lose.

            The military would be smart to tell this dude to pound sand before they, and a bunch of people die in a new civil war that they can’t win against the most armed civilian population on the planet.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            120 days ago

            its mostly asymmetrical/cyberwarefare now anyways. russia and china are both are good at this, but not militarily.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1820 days ago

        That’s the crazy part, unless they’re “outlawed” billionaires should try and improve people’s lives since it means they would have more money to spend on the crap those billionaires are selling! It’s hard to sell stuff on Amazon if everyone is struggling to afford housing and food.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1120 days ago

          Better to rule in Hell than serve in Heaven.

          They could work to remove the destitution and desperation of working people. But if their workers weren’t in such dire straits, then they wouldn’t have so much power over them. Workers with good pay and a healthy work-life balance also have more time to pursue unionization and other political activities. Even if improving the lives of the people would objectively increase the wealth of the ultra-rich, it would still decrease their power. And ultimately, the only reason people ever obtain that level of wealth is because they desire power more than anything else. People who aren’t power-hungry monsters cash out and retire early long before they reach billionaire status.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            520 days ago

            Workers with good pay and a healthy work-life balance are unlikely to pursue unions. That’s the stuff unions are trying to achieve.

        • Prehensile_cloaca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2620 days ago

          UPS just laid off 20K workers on the expectation that Amazon deliveries will be way down.

          Container ships are down 60%. More than any month during the pandemic.

          Trump is imploding the entire economy.

        • Geetnerd
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          They truly believe in the Social Darwinist belief that no one is truly compassionate, empathetic, or altruistic. It’s just an act to gain attention, or an advantage.

          They literally can’t understand it, and think it’s a stupid delusion. Their narcissism can’t comprehend that anyone would do anything without wanting something in return. And those who don’t believe that are stupid, and deserve to be exploited.

          Because winners are winners, and losers and losers. It’s the natural order. EVERYONE is looking to take what’s yours, and will abuse, rob, and kill you if they can. Because that’s what they would do.

          And then there’s the competition with other psychopaths in their peer group…

      • Geetnerd
        link
        fedilink
        English
        420 days ago

        That level of greed is mental illness. A perpetual state of fear of losing what you have.

        You have more than you can ever spend, ever, and you’re in constant fear that someone will take it from you. Because that’s would you do.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1020 days ago

      In the article, Amazon already back peddled and said it was just in the idea phase and they never really planned on implementing it.

    • Bakkoda
      link
      fedilink
      English
      220 days ago

      That’s the thing that was always gonna happen. They were always gonna bring themselves and subsequently society down. It’s just the crit multi of Donald Trump a lot of people seemed not prepared for.