@[email protected] to [email protected] • 10 days agoOpen source project curl is sick of users submitting “AI slop” vulnerabilitiesarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1413cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1413external-linkOpen source project curl is sick of users submitting “AI slop” vulnerabilitiesarstechnica.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 10 days agomessage-square48fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareDave.linkfedilink15•10 days ago Those who use AI to report to open source projects and flood the volunteering devs who keep the World going, should be disqualified from using those open source projects I propose a GPL-noAI licence with this clause inserted.
minus-squareDave.linkfedilink6•9 days agoPublic with conditions on behaviour which can lead to your licence being revoked, just like the current GPL. 🤷♂️
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•edit-28 days agoThe license doesn’t get revoked. It does not apply to things it does not allow in the first place. Some kind of restrictions are easier to describe and assess than others. I doubt someone that generates AI slob reports would care about the restrictions anyway.
I propose a GPL-noAI licence with this clause inserted.
so not GPL at all, then
Public with conditions on behaviour which can lead to your licence being revoked, just like the current GPL. 🤷♂️
The license doesn’t get revoked. It does not apply to things it does not allow in the first place.
Some kind of restrictions are easier to describe and assess than others.
I doubt someone that generates AI slob reports would care about the restrictions anyway.