• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 months ago

    Tell you what, go to that wiki, scroll down and take a gander at the part that says “reference” and let me know what you see? That’s not too much to ask, surely?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Show me a source. Wikipedia is not a source. Show me 1 specific example of a law that is “gay erasure” please. That’s not too much to ask, surely?

      Last chance then I’ll correctly assume that there are no sources on there that support the “gay erasure” argument.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        Last chance then I’ll correctly assume that there are no sources on there that support the “gay erasure” argument.

        It won’t be correct, plugging your ears, And closing your eyes isn’t “correctly assuming”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          If you can’t provide a single piece of evidence to support your argument no matter how many times you’re asked, it’s correct to assume it doesn’t exist. Bye now :)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            If you can’t be bothered to look at the evidence provided then, no its not correct to assume it doesn’t exist lol.