• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        212 days ago

        It seems like maybe you don’t. Please explain to me how what I said is wrong? If their position is that trans people don’t exist, how can they ban them from the military?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                212 days ago

                OK so you can’t show how this “denies that trans people exist”. We got there in the end.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    212 days ago

                    You haven’t, and you can’t, because if it was denying trans people exist then the entire EO wouldn’t make any sense because it would be prohibiting people that don’t exist from serving in the military.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              511 days ago

              It’s not saying “gender dysphoria is not a diagnosis that exists anywhere” it’s saying “believing yourself to be transgender is a substantial enough mental illness and flaw in character so as to preclude military service.”

              This claims that having gender dysphoria is some sort of deficiency, and not just a non-standard identifier. This invalidates the identity of trans people, and calls into question their legitimacy.