You are very badly mistaken in your assessment of this conversation. In fact you’ll notice I have repeatedly excused you from any type of judgement. Look at how I’ve signed off my last comment; this is not a moral issue, merely a practice that has damaged you.
Alcohol is bad for you. In any amount. Ten drinks a day, one drink a week, no matter. You would be better off drinking zero alcohol. I offer this wisdom to you completely free of judgement
Do you believe the above is possible? Do you believe, having offered your opinion on why AI use is fine in your case, someone can offer the viewpoint that it is damaging without judgement?
You haven’t presented any “evidence” to disagree. You’ve made subjective declarations, treating them as facts. You may be interested to know this severely damages your intelligence. Not that I’m making a moral judgement, but you should acknowledge your damaged intelligence.
It’s obvious to any reader that this is a simple and complete misread, I’m sorry to say. The evidence has been laid out very plainly for you. Please feel free to consider this interaction more carefully in the future, without the burden of pride forcing some poorly constructed reply
I notice that you are very similar to my discussion partner here in your complete inability to address the topic. Perhaps you are kindred spirits. Indeed your phrasing and even your spelling errors are similar as well. Maybe you both suffer from an AI sickness we don’t yet fully understand
But yes, your cowardice has been noted, thank you. There’s a beautiful irony in signing off your diatribe about someone else’s superiority complex by proclaiming they are beneath your further consideration. You are well acquainted with the smell of those droppings yourself, it seems
Still, no evidence has been presented. Only your subjective opinions, presented self-righteously obvious fact. This is severely damaging to your intelligence. Acknowledge it, or acknowledge that a stranger’s opinion does not constitute “evidence” by any coherent definition.
Please feel free to consider this interaction more carefully in the future, without the burden of pride forcing some poorly constructed reply
This is excellent advice, I would recommend reflecting upon it.
Correct. You’ll find many such valuable little gems, going all the way back to the beginning of this conversation.
Anyway, we’re eight comments deep now into you deflecting and changing the subject. Normally I’d love to drill into the details with anyone about facts and the nature of subjectivity, but just like before, I detect you’re merely scrambling into this territory because of the way you think it sounds in this moment. And I detect that just like before, you would simply run away once we began closing in on the truth.
So, you could save us both some time and just run away now? Would be pretty graceful at this point too, after your grand realization that you find my ‘opinions’ to be irrelevant lol
We’ve certainly come a long way from “not judging or anything”
You are very badly mistaken in your assessment of this conversation. In fact you’ll notice I have repeatedly excused you from any type of judgement. Look at how I’ve signed off my last comment; this is not a moral issue, merely a practice that has damaged you.
Alcohol is bad for you. In any amount. Ten drinks a day, one drink a week, no matter. You would be better off drinking zero alcohol. I offer this wisdom to you completely free of judgement
Do you believe the above is possible? Do you believe, having offered your opinion on why AI use is fine in your case, someone can offer the viewpoint that it is damaging without judgement?
There are other forms of judgement than just moral. Subjective proclamations are one.
You are of course free to disagree with the evidence, thank you for your consideration
You haven’t presented any “evidence” to disagree. You’ve made subjective declarations, treating them as facts. You may be interested to know this severely damages your intelligence. Not that I’m making a moral judgement, but you should acknowledge your damaged intelligence.
It’s obvious to any reader that this is a simple and complete misread, I’m sorry to say. The evidence has been laid out very plainly for you. Please feel free to consider this interaction more carefully in the future, without the burden of pride forcing some poorly constructed reply
deleted by creator
I notice that you are very similar to my discussion partner here in your complete inability to address the topic. Perhaps you are kindred spirits. Indeed your phrasing and even your spelling errors are similar as well. Maybe you both suffer from an AI sickness we don’t yet fully understand
But yes, your cowardice has been noted, thank you. There’s a beautiful irony in signing off your diatribe about someone else’s superiority complex by proclaiming they are beneath your further consideration. You are well acquainted with the smell of those droppings yourself, it seems
Still, no evidence has been presented. Only your subjective opinions, presented self-righteously obvious fact. This is severely damaging to your intelligence. Acknowledge it, or acknowledge that a stranger’s opinion does not constitute “evidence” by any coherent definition.
This is excellent advice, I would recommend reflecting upon it.
Correct. You’ll find many such valuable little gems, going all the way back to the beginning of this conversation.
Anyway, we’re eight comments deep now into you deflecting and changing the subject. Normally I’d love to drill into the details with anyone about facts and the nature of subjectivity, but just like before, I detect you’re merely scrambling into this territory because of the way you think it sounds in this moment. And I detect that just like before, you would simply run away once we began closing in on the truth.
So, you could save us both some time and just run away now? Would be pretty graceful at this point too, after your grand realization that you find my ‘opinions’ to be irrelevant lol