• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    50
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Haha yea I always check out the negative reviews first - either they quickly show that I’d be wasting my time with the game, or the negatives they highlight are actually neutral or positive for me, either way I generally find them better value/time than positive reviews. (Especially when a significant portion of positive reviews are memes, award-begging copypasta, or “best game ever” with no further details.)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 days ago

      I do the same. If the negative reviews highlight a consistent issue that I have an issue with and hasn’t been fixed, then I doubt I’ll be buying the product. Doesn’t have to be distinct to steam, either

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 days ago

      If Steam would let people leave positive reviews without a comment there would be fewer low value comments.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        I think Valve severely escalated the problem when they introduced the award system. Now people are extra motivated to cash in a quick laugh, or provoke outrage for the Clown awards. What boggles my mind the most is that hundreds of people give awards to the same copypaste comments that appear under every major game. I sometimes try to report the reviews of the spammiest accounts, but Valve is really hands-off with their moderation. At the end of the day they profit from the points system, and as always, user experience takes a firm second seat to profits :/