• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2310 days ago

    there should be a regulation that businesses who sell to minors over the internet are liable for the mistake. They’re the ones who benefit from such easy ordering, and this is a foreseeable consequence of that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1810 days ago

      How? For all they know the mother bought them. That’s what the billing and shipping info says.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2810 days ago

      That’s just asking to have online shopping become much harder, requiring more identity verification than just having a credit card and an address. Which is maybe beneficial overall; it would cut down on fraud, but I doubt it would be a popular change.

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        810 days ago

        I’m honestly pro-anything-that-reduces-consumption. This would reduce consumption because it would make people consider their purchases more.

    • Midnight Wolf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      There should be a regulation that if you don’t secure a device that is later used in a way you don’t want because of lack of said security, you are shit out of luck. - ftfy

      It’s not the fault of the business because your pin code is 1234 (or non-existent). People need to figure shit out. If a child grabs your car keys and then crashes the family sedan, it’s not Toyota’s fault; same thing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      49 days ago

      They didn’t know they were selling to a minor. He used his mother’s phone. It’s right there in the headline.