I’ve got a buddy who is a professor and he catches llm cheaters by asking them difficult questions like “what was your essay about?” and “what were the three points you made in your essay?”. I’m sure llm proponents will offer some bromide about “tools aren’t inherently good or bad”, but it seems like the reality in college is llm tools are used for cheating.
I can’t imagine the nightmare that is being a teacher nowadays, but also that is absolutely the fault of the individual. I had many ways I could cheat in school prior to AI and did not.
I’ve got a buddy who is a professor and he catches llm cheaters by asking them difficult questions like “what was your essay about?” and “what were the three points you made in your essay?”. I’m sure llm proponents will offer some bromide about “tools aren’t inherently good or bad”, but it seems like the reality in college is llm tools are used for cheating.
Sure tools are inherently good or bad. Nuclear bombs are inherently bad and mindfulness meditation is inherently good.
I can’t imagine the nightmare that is being a teacher nowadays, but also that is absolutely the fault of the individual. I had many ways I could cheat in school prior to AI and did not.