@[email protected] to [email protected] • 10 days agoU.S. declares military zone around El Paso, allowing soldiers to arrest migrantswww.texastribune.orgexternal-linkmessage-square97fedilinkarrow-up1460
arrow-up1460external-linkU.S. declares military zone around El Paso, allowing soldiers to arrest migrantswww.texastribune.org@[email protected] to [email protected] • 10 days agomessage-square97fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•10 days agoI’ll chalk that up as a “can’t answer without making myself look silly” then.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink19•edit-210 days agoMilitary unilaterally policing civil affairs on US soil HoW iS tHaT mArTiAL Law?? Just look up the definition you fucking stooge.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•10 days agoFederal military enforcing federal immigration policies is not martial law.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink12•edit-210 days ago Federal military enforcing federal immigration policies is not martial law. A military performing law enforcement isn’t martial law? Please enlighten me as to how that is lol
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-210 days agoHave the military replaced the government now? Do you know what the F in FBI stands for by any chance? Martial law this ain’t. By definition it isn’t even close.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•edit-29 days agoThe F sure as fuck doesn’t stand for Army you fucking ape. The FBI has the authority to enforce laws passed through regular congressional channels by elected officials. Here the commander in chief is declaring a policy and enforcing it directly with his own power. It’s the textbook definition.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•9 days ago Have the military replaced the government now? That would be a military junta, not martial law. Martial law is when soldiers, not peace officers, are tasked with upholding law and order. It doesn’t matter if it’s for a good reason or not, it’s still martial law.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•9 days agoSomeone needed to advocate for the freedom of the military to do whatever it wanted. Actually, no, nobody needed to do that.
Hugs, sweetie.
I’ll chalk that up as a “can’t answer without making myself look silly” then.
Military unilaterally policing civil affairs on US soil
HoW iS tHaT mArTiAL Law??
Just look up the definition you fucking stooge.
Federal military enforcing federal immigration policies is not martial law.
A military performing law enforcement isn’t martial law? Please enlighten me as to how that is lol
Have the military replaced the government now?
Do you know what the F in FBI stands for by any chance?
Martial law this ain’t. By definition it isn’t even close.
The F sure as fuck doesn’t stand for Army you fucking ape.
The FBI has the authority to enforce laws passed through regular congressional channels by elected officials.
Here the commander in chief is declaring a policy and enforcing it directly with his own power. It’s the textbook definition.
That would be a military junta, not martial law.
Martial law is when soldiers, not peace officers, are tasked with upholding law and order.
It doesn’t matter if it’s for a good reason or not, it’s still martial law.
Sure thing there, FreedomAdvocate
Someone needed to advocate for the freedom of the military to do whatever it wanted.
Actually, no, nobody needed to do that.