Lady Butterfly to [email protected]English • 7 days agoImpossiblesopuli.xyzimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1436
arrow-up1436imageImpossiblesopuli.xyzLady Butterfly to [email protected]English • 7 days agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•7 days ago Dionysius did not use a year zero; the year preceding AD 1 was 1 BC. “The Oxford Companion to the Year” by Blackburn & Holford-Strevens There was not a year zero. This isn’t a conspiracy theory.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•6 days agoBC and AD are separate numbering schemes- so just because there is no year 0 defined doesn’t mean you can’t extrapolate - 0 AD is the same as 1 BC, and you’ll have -1 AD which is equivalent to 2 BC and so forth…
There was not a year zero. This isn’t a conspiracy theory.
BC and AD are separate numbering schemes- so just because there is no year 0 defined doesn’t mean you can’t extrapolate - 0 AD is the same as 1 BC, and you’ll have -1 AD which is equivalent to 2 BC and so forth…