• Maeve
    link
    fedilink
    28 days ago

    Can you please give news sources for what you’re saying? I’m sorry, I’m just terribly uninformed on this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 days ago

      this reuters article is one.

      the problem is that all public news articles will be sketchy this early in the game. most relevant information is still classified and not available yet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      178 days ago

      additional sources for other points:

      1. terrorist bomb blasts in mumbai 2006 BBC

      2. terrorist attacks in mumbai 2008 PBS

      3. terrorist attacks on india’s parliament 2001 BBC Sounds podcast (the most neutral source i could find)

      4. osama bin laden and pakistan timeline BBC

      5. timeline of terror attacks in india random source

      • Maeve
        link
        fedilink
        38 days ago

        Thank you. I’m trying to understand what the resistance front is. Wikipedia says separatist movement that uses no religious language but there may be governmental tires or something like that. I have a feeling this isn’t going to be a one-evening dive, but months or years.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Traditionally, resistance movements in Kashmir did not target tourists. This was because it had an implicit agreement with the business class and local Kashmiris whose bread and butter was tourism. So harming tourists would make you look like an extremist who doesn’t care about the locals. Additionally, the terrorist attack was condemned by Kashmiris coming out in the streets to protest for the first time in history. TRF doesn’t have widespread support among Kashmiris because of this attack and a previous killing in Reasi, of tourists as well. In both attacks, Kashmiri people lost lives as well. A famous militant, Burhan Wani had a lot of popularity in Kashmir-300,000 people attended his funeral. But he and his gang were caught, and while they had received arms from across the border, they didn’t have the sophisticated technology that these terrorists did. This particular operation was highly sophisticated and efficient, more in the pattern of trained terrorists from the attacks above listed than indigenous rebels we’ve seen in Kashmir. So it is quite likely it was a Pakistan funded proxy. LeT is called the most reliable and efficient proxy Pakistan uses against India, though they have conducted attacks in Bosnia and Herzegovina as well.

          I can suggest a few books on Kashmir Christopher Snedden - Independant Kashmir (sympathetic to the cause, but arguably that’s the moral position to take. Either way, it’s fairly objective.) And a few on terrorism and LeT, if you’d like In their own words: Understanding Lashkar-e-Tayyaba - C. Christine Fair Storming the World Stage - the Story of Lashkar-e-Taiba - Frankel Stephen The one above goes into depth about the Pakistani government’s complicity in the activities of the group. Some of the sites detailed in this book were struck by the Indian government in the missile strike.

          • Maeve
            link
            fedilink
            78 days ago

            Thank you so much! I really appreciate you taking the time and effort to type a well-thought response to educate me on a subject about which I am woefully ignorant. I’ve bookmarked your reply so I can refer back to it. I hope others will read your post and if they’re knowledgeable, add more.