@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 7 days agoOnion be onioning againsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1811
arrow-up1811imageOnion be onioning againsh.itjust.works@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 7 days agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•6 days agoSchadensfreude isn’t invalid, it’s just a rare variant. The “s” allows for a smoother connection between the two words. If this spelling is confusing, just pretend the “s” is silent.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•6 days agoI mean, it’s at least not valid in German. There might be people using that word in English, I don’t know.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•edit-25 days agoZe fix? Ich stehe korrigiert, danke! Aber zu meiner Verteidigung: laut Ngram-Viewer ist Schadenfreude (~0.000130%) 144-mal so häufig wie Schadensfreude (~0.00000090%).
Schadensfreude isn’t invalid, it’s just a rare variant. The “s” allows for a smoother connection between the two words. If this spelling is confusing, just pretend the “s” is silent.
I mean, it’s at least not valid in German. There might be people using that word in English, I don’t know.
Ze fix? Ich stehe korrigiert, danke!
Aber zu meiner Verteidigung: laut Ngram-Viewer ist Schadenfreude (~0.000130%) 144-mal so häufig wie Schadensfreude (~0.00000090%).
Do you mean silent as in ilent?