• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    What’s your threshold of ‘in mass’? Because it was 1/9 recent college graduates working low wage jobs as of mid-2023.

    In June 2023, about 11.2 percent of recent college graduates were working in low-wage jobs in the United States. This is a slight increase from June 2021, when 10.8 percent of recent college graduates were working low-wage jobs.

    The Federal Reserve Bank of New York classifies low-wage jobs as those that tend to pay around 25,000 U.S. dollars or less. Recent college graduates are defined as those aged 22 to 27 with a bachelor’s degree or higher and not enrolled in further study.

    11% of recent graduates with degrees working low wage jobs feels like they’re actually working these roles en masse after all.

    • rowdyrockets
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      11% is certainly not nothing, but the vast majority are not working these jobs.

      I’m not really sure how you can look at 11% and say “yes, they are working these jobs en masse”. A bit disingenuous.

      Edit: Post OP and others continue to downvote - yet can’t counter. I’m sorry college didn’t have the outcome you expected, it’s definitely no longer the golden ticket it once was. But to claim it isn’t a benefit at all, or indicate that most college grads are unable to use their degrees is at best misleading and at worst disinformation. There are a lot of variables, including the major you choose, and how much you spend to complete the degree.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 days ago

        Post OP and others continue to downvote - yet can’t counter.

        Personally, I was turned off by you saying that the other commenter was being “A bit disingenuous.” just because you disagreed with them, despite the fact that I otherwise agree with your point.

        • rowdyrockets
          link
          fedilink
          13 days ago

          I stand by that. It is a bit disingenuous (purposefully or ignorantly) to call 11% “en masse”.

            • rowdyrockets
              link
              fedilink
              12 days ago

              I don’t attribute it to malice. A misleading claim is just that, misleading, whatever their intentions.

              It’s alright if we disagree.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                12 days ago

                The problem is that the word “disingenuous” does not mean “misleading”, it means “insincere”. So when you say that someone is being “a bit disingenuous”, you are necessarily commenting on their character, not just their claim.