• NatanoxOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 month ago

    I really wish everyone thought like that, but I still see people recommending Nix, Arch, Void… and some go the ideological route and start recommending systemd-less only like Artix or ranting against anything that uses Flatpak. Those discussions can get messy, and they always alienate the person who asked. Unfortunately those with ideological reasons are always the loudest and present in basically every “Beginner’s Help” group.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 month ago

      I wouldn’t recommend vanilla Arch only because of the installation process. CachyOS that simplifies it is an extremely good pick for a person who already knows what a computer is, but wants to try a proper OS.

      Arch mostly got it’s reputation in the early days. Today some things are a lot easier to do on Arch than on other distros, especially because AUR exists. Also, it built one of the best wikis over all that time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        41 month ago

        For most people though yeah, Debian is rock solid, only went arch on my desktop for nvidia drivers (and HDR), archinstall really simplifies installing it.

        Arch and Debian wikis are both amazing sources of information, highly recommend for any distro.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          The devs of the OS spell it Endeavour. It’s one of those words that’s spelled slightly different in various parts of the English-speaking sphere. As it functions as a name here, I have no problem spelling it their way when referring to the OS.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 month ago

          Weird way to spell EndeavorOS

          With the missing ‘U’? I know, right? But it’s not weird; it’s just American, so it rewrites its history.