The problem is, you cant check the ai’s sources in most cases. Id also say blindly trusting wikipedia and the internet is a huge problem nowadays. Wikipadia only has a few dozen instances of there being mass manipulation of facts but for example twitter, tiktok, etc are a huge breeding ground for misinformation. So no you shouldnt blindly rely on wikipedia/internet the same way you shouldnt rely on ai. Also the other thing is, if every time you search the internet you kill one turtle then eveey question asked to an ai is like killing a thousand…
maybe chatgpt magically has that actually work but when i’ve tried it they all just cite a nonsense source that looks valid, but either isn’t relevant or doesn’t even exist at all.
The problem is, you cant check the ai’s sources in most cases. Id also say blindly trusting wikipedia and the internet is a huge problem nowadays. Wikipadia only has a few dozen instances of there being mass manipulation of facts but for example twitter, tiktok, etc are a huge breeding ground for misinformation. So no you shouldnt blindly rely on wikipedia/internet the same way you shouldnt rely on ai. Also the other thing is, if every time you search the internet you kill one turtle then eveey question asked to an ai is like killing a thousand…
Usually it will pull up sources when asked. “ChatGTP you said “x…” could you please provide a source for that information”
maybe chatgpt magically has that actually work but when i’ve tried it they all just cite a nonsense source that looks valid, but either isn’t relevant or doesn’t even exist at all.