As simple as possible to summarize the best way you can, first, please. Feel free to expand after, or just say whatever you want lol. Honest question.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    32 months ago

    If our universe requires a being outside it as an origin, why shouldn’t that being itself require another being of even further outside as an origin, and so on?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 months ago

        Scientists believed this for the longest time, but I’ve recently seen a documentary explaining that, at the very bottom, there’s a giant koala bear. Apparently they’re still trying to determine why it’s smiling.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        TAG addresses infinite regress. A transcendent being functions outside of our physical and metaphysical constraints.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      By nature of being outside of our universe they are not subject to the same constants/restraints or our same concepts of space and time.

      But I’m not necessarily saying it’s a requirement. That’s just the line of thought I lean towards personally at this point.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        TAG addresses this in the way you describe. A transcendent being is not constrained by our physics or metaphysics.