• Nacktmull
    link
    fedilink
    882 years ago

    Maybe it wasn’t a particularly good idea to make firearms so easily available to everyone and especially to (neo)Nazis?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      362 years ago

      The need for the 2nd amendment is fundamental if you want the people, able to form a tyranny… oh wait…

      • Nacktmull
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You couldn’t be more wrong Telllos. If I didn’t have this gun, the King of England could just walk in here any time he wants and start shoving you around. Do you want that? (Pokes Telllos) Huh? (Shoves Telllos) Do ya!?

      • GladiusB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        222 years ago

        The problem is they don’t see the hypocrisy. They think tyranny only applies to the government.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Generally yeah most tyranny definitions refer to government. It’s hard to exert tyrannical rule without being a de facto government.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Turns out they have always been pro tyranny as long it’s their guy hurting the “correct” people…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      You can just print that shit now.

      Imagine if these crazy fucks didn’t already have guns and they just discovered printable ones, I think that would have been a worse outcome.

      • @[email protected]M
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        Why does everyone thing 3D printing is magic? You’re not going to be 3D printing weapons that can kill scores of poeple. Any firearm printed on an FDM printer is lucky to fire once without injuring the dipshit wielder.

        • 👁️🫦👁️
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          This comment betrays a lack of understanding around 3d printed firearms.

          Of course there are your (nearly) fully plastic single shots like the Harlot that fire small calibers and dont always last long.

          On the other hand, there’s plastic lowers (the only part considered a firearm and thus the onlynpart that needs to be bought through an FFL) for AR15s that use off the shelf plumbing supplies for the pressure bearing components.

          The files are readily available and able to be printed on low end FDM printers with little adjustment and troubleshooting completely bypassing the need to purchase a firearm from a dealer.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 years ago

        Please elaborate as to how that would be worse. At least half these nutters wouldn’t be able to figure out how to use a printer, let alone a 3d printer.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          This thread has, predictably, devolved into a hugely disrespectful exchange given the linked post.

          But as an aside, I shudder to think of trying to design an additively manufactured part that would reliably contain a propellant blast using anything less than an industrial $100k-$1m DMLS or at least really really good SLS machine. If the goal is to harm somebody using a 3D printer, you’d probably be better off bashing them over the head with it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            Full plastic guns generally don’t last very long- but they have been proven to somewhat work since 2013. Now there are more stable designs that use off-the-shelf plumbing parts with plastic components. There are also designs that can be CNC’d with a cheap machine