@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 month ago"the only browser that's not evil" What are your thoughts?sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up114
arrow-up114image"the only browser that's not evil" What are your thoughts?sh.itjust.works@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•1 month agoI’d say they’re still not evil, they unfortunately just let themselves be captured by an evil company to keep them afloat.
minus-squareBahnd Rollardlinkfedilink5•edit-21 month agoGoogle does that because you cant use Safari if your not on a fruit device and the feds will dust off the anti-trust book and throw it at them ar mach 6 otherwise.
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍linkfedilink13•1 month agoAny company who pays their CEO $6.9 million dollars - a thousand times the salary of their lowest white-collar employee - can’t claim to be not evil.
I’d say they’re still not evil, they unfortunately just let themselves be captured by an evil company to keep them afloat.
Google does that because you cant use Safari if your not on a fruit device and the feds will dust off the anti-trust book and throw it at them ar mach 6 otherwise.
Any company who pays their CEO $6.9 million dollars - a thousand times the salary of their lowest white-collar employee - can’t claim to be not evil.