• booty [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It is not unsafe.
    It is not 100% private. Admins can read your messages if they choose to investigate your messages.

    These points contradict one another.

    • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      How so? The message is safely delivered solely to the intended recipient, albeit in plain text (not private).

      If there’s anywhere that the commonly used email analogy fits, I think it would be here

          • booty [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            What definition of safe are you using which makes a private messaging system without privacy safe? What would have to occur for it to become unsafe, if not being private does not make it unsafe in your eyes?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            Unless I run a Lemmy instance myself (which is possible), I have zero reason to trust an instance’s admins.

            Even if my instance’s admin happens to be the founder of privacyguides.org, that doesn’t mean he will never read any “private” messages (or be forced by someone else to hand them over).

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                32 years ago

                Even if I did fully trust my instance, I also would have to trust any instance I message with.

                I personally just use Lemmy for public comments.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      It does what it claims to do, it’s just that what it claims to do is clearly not complete privacy.

      • booty [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        If something claims to be unsafe and delivers, that doesn’t make it any more safe.