Hofmaimaier to [email protected] • 2 months agoUh, yeah. That rings a bell.feddit.orgimagemessage-square124fedilinkarrow-up11.37Kcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.37KimageUh, yeah. That rings a bell.feddit.orgHofmaimaier to [email protected] • 2 months agomessage-square124fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-21 month agoIt’s not an inherent obligation, but if you genuinely oppose those ideas, you’d feel compelled to argue against them if someone expressed them, or else remove yourself from the situation ASAP
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 month agoYou’re saying you would, I explained why others might not feel the same way, and still genuinely oppose them
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoYou can’t genuinely oppose something and tolerate it at the same time, that’s a contradiction
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoThen I suppose we disagree on what “oppose” or “tolerate” mean
It’s not an inherent obligation, but if you genuinely oppose those ideas, you’d feel compelled to argue against them if someone expressed them, or else remove yourself from the situation ASAP
You’re saying you would, I explained why others might not feel the same way, and still genuinely oppose them
You can’t genuinely oppose something and tolerate it at the same time, that’s a contradiction
I don’t agree with that
Then I suppose we disagree on what “oppose” or “tolerate” mean