@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month agoProprietary vs Open Source Backdoorslemy.lolimagemessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up11.39K
arrow-up11.39KimageProprietary vs Open Source Backdoorslemy.lol@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month agomessage-square92fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish53•1 month agoAlso, many proprietary softwares rely on open source libraries. So unless they catch, patch, and do not contribute those fixes, proprietary will be at least as vulnerable as the oss they depend on.
minus-squarePossibly linuxlinkfedilinkEnglish12•1 month agoIt always seems like it depends on really old libraries with major security flaws
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 month agoSorry, there’s no business case for rebasing those dependencies. Please focus story points on active marketing requirements instead.
Also, many proprietary softwares rely on open source libraries. So unless they catch, patch, and do not contribute those fixes, proprietary will be at least as vulnerable as the oss they depend on.
It always seems like it depends on really old libraries with major security flaws
Sorry, there’s no business case for rebasing those dependencies. Please focus story points on active marketing requirements instead.