@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 12 days agoBaldur's Gaytemander.xyzimagemessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1948
arrow-up1948imageBaldur's Gaytemander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 12 days agomessage-square69fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish94•12 days agoThis is one of those “if you cut a hole in a net, it then has less holes than before” type arguments and I’m all here for it.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish14•11 days agoI think it would still techically be more hole since a larger total area would be hole. I would be fewer holes, though.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•10 days agoWhat gets bigger, the more you take away from it? My love for a blue Dwarf.
This is one of those “if you cut a hole in a net, it then has less holes than before” type arguments and I’m all here for it.
I think it would still techically be more hole since a larger total area would be hole.
I would be fewer holes, though.
But there’s more hole per hole
What gets bigger, the more you take away from it?
My love for a blue Dwarf.