• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    There will always be a distribution of wealth. The key thing is how broad that distribution is.

    • R0cket_M00se
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 years ago

      Yeah, there’s no problem with a meritocracy as long as the top and the bottom of the gradient aren’t (literally can’t pay bills -> more money than you could ever spend.)

      Like in no sane world would people willingly become surgeons for the same pay as a sanitation worker, that’s just fucking stupid. Why spend a decade going through school to be a doctor when you could just go pick up trash and make the same money? We have to have some kind of variation in pay scale or society wouldnt function.

      Like you said, how much difference between the top and the bottom definitely doesn’t have to be what it is.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        Yeah but in the current form of meritocracy both the surgeon and the sanitation worker are relatively poor compared to the upper class. And that exactly is the problem: you cant get rich just by working.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 years ago

        Assuming that the education could be free, why wouldn’t you expect people to train as surgeons?

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          I think it’s funny that some people think that if they wouldn’t do it themselves then no one would.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        I currently make more money than the average surgeon does in the UK, and it isn’t close. Top end is like 130k for them.

        People will still be doctors if you cut the pay doctors get, because they are, elsewhere, right now.