Pro to [email protected]English • 11 days agoGNOME introducing stronger dependencies on systemdblogs.gnome.orgmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up143cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up143external-linkGNOME introducing stronger dependencies on systemdblogs.gnome.orgPro to [email protected]English • 11 days agomessage-square13fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareDark ArclinkfedilinkEnglish8•10 days agoYeah, I generally agree; I’m a big fan of systemd on Linux. However, on BSD this does sound unfortunately likely to be painful.
minus-squareesalinkfedilink3•10 days agoI’ve heard of the year of Linux on the desktop, but I’ve never really heard of the year of BSD on the desktop. Apart from OSX, maybe. I guess this is the kind of stuff POSIX could’ve helped with, but it seems to be busy mandating buggy behaviour.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•10 days agoAnyone developing desktop for BSD will likely just gravitate to xfce or similar I bet. I honestly am not sure what ghostbsd or midnight or others package by default now.
minus-squareDark ArclinkfedilinkEnglish3•10 days agoI’m not either, I’ve never even ran a BSD desktop… But I support the BSD desktop existing and wish it well.
Yeah, I generally agree; I’m a big fan of systemd on Linux.
However, on BSD this does sound unfortunately likely to be painful.
I’ve heard of the year of Linux on the desktop, but I’ve never really heard of the year of BSD on the desktop. Apart from OSX, maybe.
I guess this is the kind of stuff POSIX could’ve helped with, but it seems to be busy mandating buggy behaviour.
Anyone developing desktop for BSD will likely just gravitate to xfce or similar I bet. I honestly am not sure what ghostbsd or midnight or others package by default now.
I’m not either, I’ve never even ran a BSD desktop… But I support the BSD desktop existing and wish it well.