@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month agoProprietary vs Open Source Backdoorslemy.lolimagemessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up11.39K
arrow-up11.39KimageProprietary vs Open Source Backdoorslemy.lol@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 month agomessage-square92fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•1 month ago Company free speech is allowed, but there’s laws to keep them from being total asshats “Things” shouldn’t have free speech - only people. It’s just such a corrupt, dumb thing.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 month agoAs a non-native English speaker, I’ve assumed it meant that companies can put anything they want in their contracts
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•1 month agoNo it’s basically that companies can put money into politics.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 month agoThere was a court case called the ‘Citizens United v FEC’ that ended up ruling in favor of corporations; It said corporations and organizations and unions can ‘donate’ as much money as they want to political candidates i.e. legalized bribery.
“Things” shouldn’t have free speech - only people. It’s just such a corrupt, dumb thing.
As a non-native English speaker, I’ve assumed it meant that companies can put anything they want in their contracts
No it’s basically that companies can put money into politics.
There was a court case called the ‘Citizens United v FEC’ that ended up ruling in favor of corporations; It said corporations and organizations and unions can ‘donate’ as much money as they want to political candidates i.e. legalized bribery.