• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    216 days ago

    Woah, that’s nuts. I feel like most missiles don’t reach target in Israel. Maybe that’s cause most are aimed at Jerusalem and the Iron Dome though?

    • Avid Amoeba
      link
      fedilink
      156 days ago

      I don’t know if anyone has any real information but I’d think Iran would be shooting air bases and such. Targets that hurt Israel’s ability to hurt Iran. Israel’s command probably cares less about a residential building (full of people or empty) than a hangar with F35s.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        166 days ago

        Iran are definitely targeting air bases and other militarized targets which are regions Israel has a media blackout on so we don’t hear about them as much and only hear about impacts in Tel-Aviv which is a militarized “civilian” zone (human shields was always projection of their own policies).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        216 days ago

        Iran has spent decades building an arsenal of cheap drones that aren’t really designed to hit targets, they are designed to financially cripple Israel by expending expensive iron dome charges.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          126 days ago

          From I’ve seen they certainly used that initially with mostly older, cheaper, and slower drones in the initial waves intentionally to bleed out the iron dome but have been changing their strategy as the “Iron Dome” is weakened and/or gaps are discovered.

          With each wave they adjust their strategy. Interspersing more Hypersonics and layering the drones in different patterns/locations to more readily distract/avoid the iron dome.

          From estimated ratios of 9 impacts out of/150 launched in the first few waves vs 9/50 in the more recent waves.

          Though obviously Israel hides the damage/strikes through media blackouts on military sites so we can’t know for sure how accurate these estimates are and we mainly only get reporting on impacts in Tel-Aviv or other militarized “civilian” zones.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            65 days ago

            Oh for sure, I’m just saying they don’t even need to hit any targets and they’d still be winning long term. They are capable of much more, and Israel can’t fight Iran without US.

            Satanyahu is betting on forcing Trump to agree to war with Iran on his watch. Avoiding that is thankfully one of Trump’s main priorities, hopefully they don’t succeed in changing his calculus on it.

            And they aren’t able to and won’t be able to maintain media blackout much longer, Iran has stated that they will keep going and will go harder, and we’ve already seen some seriously damaged neighborhoods. As long as Iran keeps it reasonable (and what is reasonable has changed tremendously in the last two years of genocide and western media going hard to defend and justify Israeli war crimes), I think Trump can tolerate way more destruction of Tel Aviv than netanyahu thought he would.

        • humble_boatsman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          86 days ago

          And the numbers are staggering. I forget exactly but those early retaliations for assassination last year that where laughed at expended something like 100s of millions of dollars.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        75 days ago

        Since Israel bombed the Iranian oil refinery and airport, Iran has started targeting Israeli power plants, ports and other infrastructure.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        26 days ago

        I feel like attacking civilians also helps Israel’s propaganda while not hurting it’s capacity to continue escalating.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      326 days ago

      The slower ones frequently get intercepted, but every time I see one land it is those hypersonic fast ones.

      • Redex
        link
        fedilink
        45 days ago

        I doubt Iran has any real hypersonic missiles, these are probably just balistic missiles.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          75 days ago

          You can definitely see a difference in speed between the missiles. Occasionally a slower missile lands as well.

          • Redex
            link
            fedilink
            75 days ago

            I think the difference in speed in the video is just perspective + distance, plust Iran has many different types of balistic missiles. I mean, technically speaking many balistic missiles do go at hypersonic speeds, but that’s not what people mean when they say hypersonic missile, they refer to missiles that fly very low at hypersonic speed and can maneuver before hitting their target. You can clearly see the balistic trajectory of these missiles.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              25 days ago

              I’m no expert, but usually when missiles “go ballistic” their engines turn off and they have limited maneuvering capability at the end of their flight.

              This one looks like it had engines on all the way to the target, which is a fairly newer class of design.

              • Redex
                link
                fedilink
                35 days ago

                I mean I’m no expert either but you can see this characteristic burning on most ICBM videos, it’s just the reentry vehicle reaching insane temperatures.

                E.g.: https://youtu.be/3ZM3y5qpMgY