• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    111 days ago

    Yes, they seem to be attempting to avoid a MAGA boycott by saying this is a personal choice by the Walton heiress, which just coincidentally aligns with Walmart’s pushback attempts against cuts to social benefit programs that’s expected to impact their profits.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 days ago

      So YOUR ASSERTION is that all the ads say “No Kings Day, brought to you by WalMart!” but they’re offended by ONE ad (in a publication that MAGA hates and would never pay to see) and that might possibly cost them the MAGA patronage?

      Explain this. In detail. Fully.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 days ago

        I don’t know how to explain this in a way you’ll understand it. I don’t have any training in teaching the mentally challenged.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            111 days ago

            Are struggling with bipolar or some other personality disorder? It’s one thing to not understand something. It’s quite another to be aggressively confused. This is not healthy.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              Deflection will not work. You have been called out to BACK UP YOUR GODDAMN MOTHERFUCKING CLAIM. Either do it or accept that you’re a goddamn motherfucking lying sack of dog shit. Super easy, barely an inconvenience.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  11 days ago

                  I will give you the benefit of a doubt and assume that you did not see my request for proof if your claim because it went into the wrong thread. So: Prove your goddamn claim.