Meme of two women fighting while a man smokes from a pipe in the background.

The women fighting are labeled “mathematicians defining pi” and “engineers just using 3 because it’s within tolerance”

The man smoking is labeled “astrophysicists” and the pipe is labeled “pi = 1”

    • Droechai
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      I’ve seen some blueprints who use 3.5. I guess it’s close enough but definitely not too small

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            LOL. That’s not what I meant. Unfortunately it is what I said.

            What I should have said is, if you are going to use a number after a decimal point (or comma in Europe) then why not use the right number. My bad.

            • Droechai
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              A very good question, I think it was in an old DIY wood crafts book for older kids. I’m gonna dig through my book boxes to see if I find it :) Any excuse to go through them!

              Edit: I’m autistic so it’s not uncommon to read stuff to literally, so don’t worry

    • Sigilos
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      Electrician over here is killing the buzz

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I just use the pi from my calculator or numpy/matlab. But I’m often too lazy for vacuum speed of light and use 3e8 m/s.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        That’s close enough for radio. You can’t cut an antenna much closer than that precision, and it’ll stretch or shrink with temperature anyway. I guess the error could add up enough to be a problem in lengths of fibre optic cables, especially as they run at about c/3

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          That’s kind of the beauty here, you only get a relative error (0.069%) and it’s mostly insignificant to the point of being smaller than your fabrication tolerances. This should also be the case for fibre optics. The error can’t really add up, you scale everything to a multiple of the wavelength and you calculate the wavelength using the speed of light.