I love to show that kind of shit to AI boosters. (In case you’re wondering, the numbers were chosen randomly and the answer is incorrect).

They go waaa waaa its not a calculator, and then I can point out that it got the leading 6 digits and the last digit correct, which is a lot better than it did on the “softer” parts of the test.

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    The funny thing is, even though I wouldn’t expect it to be, it is still a lot more arithmetically sound than what ever is it that is going on with it claiming to use a code interpreter and a calculator to double check the result.

    It is OK (7 out of 12 correct digits) at being a calculator and it is awesome at being a lying sack of shit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      126 days ago

      lying sack of shit

      Random tokens can’t lie to you, because they’re strings of text. Interpreting this as a lie is an interesting response