• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3630 days ago

    Do you really want Iran to have nukes though?

    Just because Israel are horrible, doesn’t automatically make the people they’re fighting the good guys.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      729 days ago

      Most definitely. I want every country on Earth to have their own nuclear weapons. It’s the ultimate deterrent.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      229 days ago

      Funny how liberals never say this about Ukraine and Russia. It’s only when non-whites fight back that they start bloviating about “both sides bad”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          129 days ago

          Don’t worry, I understand that - while it may seems to be an analogous situation on the surface - Ukraine a White country and Iran is not, and to Western liberals, that makes all the difference in the world.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            129 days ago

            Ukraine a White country and Iran is not

            And yet Iran is literally where the “Aryians” originated who were idolized by Hitler.

            , and to Western liberals, that makes all the difference in the world.

            Here is the actual thing that makes all the difference in the world. It would be racist to think that Iranians don’t deserve human rights and freedom, which implies they aren’t as good as people in the west.

            Russia, Iran - dictatorships.

            Ukraine - democracy

            Israel - democracy (but moving away)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              329 days ago

              The fact that you consider Israel a democracy when it denies millions of its subjects, not just the right to vote, but all rights at all, further demonstrates that you’re just a white supremacist.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        “non-whites fight back” is an interesting way to describe the fucked up, nuke happy, Ayatollah regime that’s plaguing Iran.

      • OKRainbowKid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        629 days ago

        Funny how tankies always think “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”. They have no capacity for nuance.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          129 days ago

          Well I never said that, so you’re just straw-manning because you can’t address what I actually said.

          And again, funny how this “capacity for nuance” didn’t come out for Ukraine, only for the non-white country. Almost like liberals are ultimately just white supremacists.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        129 days ago

        It’s only when non-whites fight back that they start bloviating about “both sides bad”

        To be thinking that Iranians aren’t good enough to deserve human rights and democracy because they aren’t western/white sounds racist.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      229 days ago

      Do you really want Iran to have nukes though?

      Iran has the right to defend themselves. Without nukes, they’re going to end up like Iraq, Libya, or the countless other countries that Israel and the US felt like destroying. They’re champing at the bit to smash Iran to pieces and it’s not going to stop at limiting nuclear capabilities.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      929 days ago

      Honestly no but if I lived in a country or bloc without nukes myself I’d want my government to get them because its the only way to not get randomly regime changed whenever the US, UK or Russia feels like it. Totally understandable why they would want them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      329 days ago

      Hasn’t Iran a religious edict stating they cannot build or use nukes? We could be in a iraki WMD phase again (expecting Powell’s jar to appear any moment now).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1529 days ago

        Every credible comment I’ve read says they’re in the process of developing them, the only group who says otherwise is Iran themselves.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          629 days ago

          They havent been in the process of developing them. They have been enriching Uranium to the level needed for developing a nuclear weapon.

          Iran has always been “close” to develop nuclear weapons over the past years, to ensure that it can do so to defend itself in the case of an attack. Now with Israels unprecedented attack, it is more likely that Iran sees the need to actually develop a nuke to protect its existence.

          Israel knows this and keeps pushing to quickly get the US involved beyond a point of no return and fight the war against Iran for them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            429 days ago

            Israels attack follows a report from the IEAE stating that Iran has likely started the race to a bomb. They (Iran) have also recently expelled UN oversight from their enrichment sites.

            I’m not defending Israel but what does that look like to you? Sure seems like for some people their hatred for Israel is clouding their objective judgement.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              329 days ago

              Israels attack follows a report from the IEAE

              And that report follows a document leak showing the IEAE actively passing on confidential reports from Iran directly to Israel.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            429 days ago

            They have been enriching Uranium to the level needed for developing a nuclear weapon.

            Isn’t that part of the process though?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              329 days ago

              It is a prerequirement.

              If you produce thick steel sheets, that is a requirement to build tanks, but it doesnt mean you are building tanks.

              Now if you start welding those sheets together in a tank shape, while making all the other stuff that you find in a tank, now you are building a tank.

              So if Iran starts building specific parts for nukes and processing the enriched Uranium in a way that is suitable for making a warhead, that would be building a nuke.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                329 days ago

                So if Iran starts building specific parts for nukes and processing the enriched Uranium in a way that is suitable for making a warhead, that would be building a nuke.

                Which is precisely what they’re doing, unless you actually believe they want that level of enrichment for a power plant.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  229 days ago

                  No matter how many tires you are stockpiling, you aren’t manufacturing a car, unless you actually manufacture a car.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    129 days ago

                    By that line of reasoning, they could have all the components of a nuke, and not actually be manufacturing one until they bolt it together.

      • BombOmOmOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        Iran has multiple enrichment sites, with a reported 83.7% pure U-235. Such purity is only needed for one thing, and it isn’t nuclear power plants which typically only need 3%-5% U-235.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          829 days ago

          Haleu fuel is pretty common that’s enriched up to about 20%. Highly enriched fuel is still used for nuclear power on aircraft carriers that use 93% enriched U235.

          Iran is definitely just trying to make weapons but wanted to at least give some examples of higher enriched fuels

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            29 days ago

            Being that we know Iran sells weapons to Russia, I wonder where it would be cheaper to produce weapons. Would it be cheaper for Russia to pay to have certain things created elsewhere or in Russia. We know a lot of Russia’s weapons in the past were built in what now is Ukraine. Examples would be their Aircraft Carriers, destroyers, etc. Hell one of their main Aircraft Carriers was named Kiev

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        330 days ago

        From all available intelligence, no. They clearly have a nuclear weapons program (which are insanely huge to begin with) but there has never been a measured test, and no evidence of enriched uranium at a high enough purity to be weaponized.

        It’s insanely hard work to created weaponized enriched uranium. With the sanctions Iran has had for decades it would be next to impossible for them to get all the stuff they need to create it on their own.