@[email protected] to You Should [email protected] • edit-221 days agoYSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failedwww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square452fedilinkarrow-up11.24Kcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11.24Kexternal-linkYSK: Non-violent protests are 2x more likely to succeed and no non-violent movement that has involved more than 3.5% of a population has ever failedwww.bbc.com@[email protected] to You Should [email protected] • edit-221 days agomessage-square452fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•19 days agoBy that logic no protest has ever had any impact. You sound like a real bootlicker rn.
minus-squareNSRXNlinkfedilink3•19 days agoI’m not anti protest. I’m challenging the assertion that the Iraq war protests worked.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•19 days agoYou have challenged the assertion that protests in any way affect the outcome of elections or what choices politicians make.
By that logic no protest has ever had any impact. You sound like a real bootlicker rn.
nonviolence protects the state
So does being anti-protest, bootlicker.
I’m not anti protest. I’m challenging the assertion that the Iraq war protests worked.
You have challenged the assertion that protests in any way affect the outcome of elections or what choices politicians make.
anyone can read what I wrote and see this is a lie