The home, which was run by an order of Catholic nuns and closed in 1961, was one of many such institutions that housed tens of thousands of orphans and unmarried pregnant women who were forced to give up their children throughout much of the 20th century.

In 2014, historian Catherine Corless tracked down death certificates for nearly 800 children who died at the home in Tuam between the 1920s and 1961 — but could only find a burial record for one child.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      129 days ago

      Wow, what an awful but fascinating read. Really changes the perspective on this.

      It wasnt a place that harmed or neglected children, but rather a place that housed the most vulnerable at a difficult time and endured immense hardship.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        329 days ago

        Actually it was a place that harmed, neglected and even tortured children.

        "There can be no Justice without redress for survivors and that redress must be paid for by Religious Orders who have harvested enormous wealth by inflicting misery and death on the most vulnerable in our society.

        There can be no Justice without an Inquest into the dead of Tuam. They died horribly and unnecessarily. They had no life as children. The State owes them the dignity of an Inquest and a Death Certificate that truly shows why they died.

        There can be no more betrayals of our dead children."

        Source: Tuam Home Survivors

        Also check out the Wikipedia article. The investigations and excavations are ongoing, so there will be proof of even more atrocities uncovered.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      629 days ago

      Honestly, I’m disgusted how you misquote Snopes in an attempt to smear the historian and to gloss over the atrocities committed at Tuam and similar facilities.

      The Snopes article pretty much contradicts your comment entirely.

      Other Sources:

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1429 days ago

      You say the number is inaccurate, which begs the question: what exactly is an acceptable number of infant remains to find in an orphanage septic tank?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        29 days ago

        There’s an extensive Wikipedia article outlining known facts and atrocities - dumping the bodies is probably the least atrocious thing they’ve done.

        EDIT: I believe OP is trying to distract from the atrocities by focussing on a minor one and misquoting Snopes.

      • 52fighters
        link
        fedilink
        English
        329 days ago

        If you read the scopes article, the number is zero and zero is a great number. “The human remains found by the Commission are not in a sewage tank but in a second structure with 20 chambers…” How did these children die? Were they murdered? Was there a pandemic? Neglect? Famine? Over what time range was this collective grave used?

        After the story in Canada that sparked the burning of multiple churches was found out to be entirely false, I’m going to wait for actual facts here.