• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    222 days ago

    using the phone number is still a pretty unnecessary risk, imho.

    there’s no real need for it any longer.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 days ago

      Do you have a better approach to prevent spam in mind? Without a barrier of entry it becomes a serious issue.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Spam prevention? Ive got spam on Signal. Having your phone number be the barrier of entry doesn’t make Signal a flawless app.

        and considering i can just plug a google voice number in, I’m not sure its the best barrier.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          Spam isn’t a binary issue, where it either exists or doesn’t. It could very well be the case that, without requiring a phone number, there’d be far more spam (since it’d be far easier to automatically create new accounts).

          Again, do you have a better suggestion for spam & abuse prevention?

          And still, aside from that - it doesn’t really make sense to expect Signal to offer SMS integration just because it requires a phone number for spam prevention, when offering this integration would be detrimental towards the mission of Signal (offering secure messages).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            121 days ago

            it does make sense, actually. as they had that function when the app was first around. why do you think they have you sign up with a phone number in the first place?

            also, it’s not on me to solve every technical hurdle you make up. if you want to learn more about Spam Prevention methods, I can point you to some resources if you’re truly interested.

            I’m sorry that not everyone thinks Signal is a god app worthy of worship. its a message app, and its not the only one. it does stuff some people don’t like. including me.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              121 days ago

              why do you think they have you sign up with a phone number in the first place?

              Again, spam & abuse prevention. We’ve been over this.

              I’m sorry that not everyone thinks Signal is a god app worthy of worship. its a message app, and its not the only one. it does stuff some people don’t like. including me.

              I’m not saying that Signal is a god app worthy of worship, I’m saying it’s detrimental for them to include SMS functionality, since that’s fundamentally insecure. That’s literally why they removed it. Is that so hard to understand?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                121 days ago

                nope I fully understand it. completely. and when they removed it, they removed my need for their app. as suddenly I went from being able to message everyone, to being able to message just 2 people.

                it no longer fits my needs. so it isn’t used by me or by both of the people that were leftover after the sms turn off. as they had the same reaction I did.

                so that’s that, I suppose.