• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        45 days ago

        My other reply to you was literally entirely composed of a supporting link. Quit being disingenuous.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          15 days ago

          And I told you, you posted a link to classic liberalism. It is a subset of liberalism it is not liberalism

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        116 days ago

        No. We’re right. You’ve been given references. Just because you obstinantly ignore those references does not make you correct or smart.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          26 days ago

          No I’m right I gave references, nobody has provided anything that has shown that liberalism is right

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            24 days ago

            They gave references, you ninny. It doesn’t matter if you have references if everyone is bringing a lot more of rhem in to it, which they have.

            Again, obstinance should not be confused with being correct. That’s just being in denial… You are in denial.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              What reference. The only one was a link to something I had already shared and it linked to the one area of liberalism that is considered center or center right. So let me know which link I’d love to know