Agent Karyo to [email protected]English • 14 days agoSteam now generates three times more revenue for Capcom than PlayStationwww.techspot.comexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1235cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1235external-linkSteam now generates three times more revenue for Capcom than PlayStationwww.techspot.comAgent Karyo to [email protected]English • 14 days agomessage-square34fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish78•14 days agoThen maybe they should fucking optimise their PC ports.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•13 days agoStill amazed how well Wilds sold after that dumpster fire of a demo. I’d also recommend they open up the co-op more, but common sense multiplayer seems a bridge too far 🙄
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•13 days agoI am one of the unfortunate ones for whom the demo ran perfectly, so I thought the full release would too. It did not.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•13 days agoDamn, you must have a beefy rig. Even setting aside the weird texture issues, FPS was all over the place for me. Knew it was a hard pass pretty quick.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-213 days agoI wouldn’t say it’s very beefy. 3080ti and a Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Ran at a pretty steady 70-80fps for me. The demo, that is. The full game is all over the place for me too.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•12 days agoYou have all that and you were getting 70fps and think that is optimized? Youre insane
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•11 days agoThat’s a pretty beefy rig: top end CPU nearly top-end GPU probably a high end mobo and RAM
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•12 days agoThe demo didn’t run perfectly on any systems, it is literally not optimized in the slightest.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•14 days agoI agree, but they have no incentive to do so when gamers buy it anyway. People need to vote with their wallets. Call of Duty sales suggest this isn’t happening.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish11•13 days agoPeople do vote with their wallets. They say it’s ok.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•12 days ago People need to vote with their wallets. that’s why many companies seek to optimize their ports to work for mobile gaming. call of duty mobile -vs- cod pc or console is a case of that imo
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•12 days agoTo be fair performance was poopy on ps5 too
Then maybe they should fucking optimise their PC ports.
Still amazed how well Wilds sold after that dumpster fire of a demo.
I’d also recommend they open up the co-op more, but common sense multiplayer seems a bridge too far 🙄
I am one of the unfortunate ones for whom the demo ran perfectly, so I thought the full release would too. It did not.
Damn, you must have a beefy rig. Even setting aside the weird texture issues, FPS was all over the place for me. Knew it was a hard pass pretty quick.
I wouldn’t say it’s very beefy. 3080ti and a Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Ran at a pretty steady 70-80fps for me.
The demo, that is. The full game is all over the place for me too.
You have all that and you were getting 70fps and think that is optimized? Youre insane
That’s a pretty beefy rig:
The demo didn’t run perfectly on any systems, it is literally not optimized in the slightest.
I also have an awesome computer
I agree, but they have no incentive to do so when gamers buy it anyway. People need to vote with their wallets.
Call of Duty sales suggest this isn’t happening.
People do vote with their wallets. They say it’s ok.
that’s why many companies seek to optimize their ports to work for mobile gaming. call of duty mobile -vs- cod pc or console is a case of that imo
To be fair performance was poopy on ps5 too