“They’re going to get on the bandwagon,” Dershowitz said of prosecutors. The “approach is to get him before the election, convict him before the election, and he wins on appeal.”
“I predict there’ll be some convictions,” speculated the lawyer. “I think the strategy is to get bad convictions, but to get them fast,” he continued, saying that Trump would then be able to appeal the decisions, after the election. Dershowitz argued that this is the reason prosecutors are “rushing” to get their cases against Trump to trial.
He didn’t just say Trump would win on appeal or “He believes there will be convictions but overturned in appeals.” He predicting the approach of the prosecutors and said more than this.
This is what he said correct?
Yes which matches what I said. Use your words. I’m not going back and forth fifty times because you can’t form a coherent discussion.
Point out what you think I stated incorrectly and we can discourse that. Otherwise this is a waste of my time.
This what you said, correct?
Yes. That is exactly what he states in the quote. Trump wins on appeal.
And why does that? His reasoning he states in the articles?
deleted by creator
It is an error on you.
He didn’t just say Trump would win on appeal or “He believes there will be convictions but overturned in appeals.” He predicting the approach of the prosecutors and said more than this.
You are being dishonest.
Well I can tell you’re not a lawyer.
If the conviction is overturned in appeal then Trump wins. That would null the conviction.
Have a good day