i absolutely hate how the modern web just fails to load if one has javascript turned off. i, as a user, should be able to switch off javascript and have the site work exactly as it does with javascript turned on. it’s not a hard concept, people.

but you ask candidates to explain “graceful degradation” and they’ll sit and look at you with a blank stare.

  • Lena
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1411 days ago

    Fair, some websites do need JavaScript though. Such as webapps. Could they be server-side rendered?

    • candyman337
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1011 days ago

      Depending on the web app, the real solution would be a much more simplified JavaScript free version

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 days ago

        Why spend time and money on something that will end up being only half functional. It costs money to support that.

        • candyman337
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 days ago

          For the sake of graceful degredation, that’s the whole point of the post

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        510 days ago

        They know ssr is a thing which is why they used that term. But ssr produces a static page or static component, where webapps often require some level of interactivity for their basic functionality, such as reacting to server events. They’re asking if that can be achieved with ssr