stoiclime to [email protected]English • 2 years agoIndia landed on the Moon for less than it cost to make Interstellar | The Independentwww.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1356cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1356external-linkIndia landed on the Moon for less than it cost to make Interstellar | The Independentwww.independent.co.ukstoiclime to [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square42fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish25•2 years agoAnd unlike Russia, they were successful
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-22 years agoOn the second try. First time their engine also over preformed putting them out of the very narrow corridor that their altimeter was expecting. But it looks like India has really overhauled and reworked the code to be much more robust this time.
minus-squareiamaklinkfedilinkEnglish7•2 years agoYou could say Russian landing was more impactful and groundbreaking
minus-squarepingvenolinkfedilink15•2 years agoRussia landed on the moon, too. They just had a few more pieces.
And unlike Russia, they were successful
On the second try. First time their engine also over preformed putting them out of the very narrow corridor that their altimeter was expecting. But it looks like India has really overhauled and reworked the code to be much more robust this time.
You could say Russian landing was more impactful and groundbreaking
Ba dum tiss
India landed on the moon.
Russia landed on the moon, too. They just had a few more pieces.
They were spreading their control zone
They were going for a speed record.
Any%