I would say so, if it weren’t for the rigorous scientific theory behind it. But, again, Marx is far from my saviour. For one, many have come after that improved upon his theories since his works. So, you continue to miss the mark.
Trust me, saying all of history is composed of two groups of people is a gross oversimplification based on a philosophical (not scientific) root, that clearly is made to enforce that “us Vs them” mentality
You have no self-proclaimed religion because it would take your religion’s place, and that won’t be allowed
Lol what
What is my religion?
Who are my priests?
What is my doctrine?
What are its ethics and commandments?
What are the rituals? Is prayer involved?
Isn’t the “liberation of workers and the achievement of communism” prophetic enough for you?
I would say so, if it weren’t for the rigorous scientific theory behind it. But, again, Marx is far from my saviour. For one, many have come after that improved upon his theories since his works. So, you continue to miss the mark.
You haven’t answered any of my questions.
The only scientific part of Marx’s “theory” is the part where he says it is, nothing more than that.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Engels_Socialism_Utopian_and_Scientific.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectical_materialism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_materialism
That’s nothing but gross oversimplifications of events that have little to nothing to do with science
Read first, then judge.
Trust me, saying all of history is composed of two groups of people is a gross oversimplification based on a philosophical (not scientific) root, that clearly is made to enforce that “us Vs them” mentality