• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      222 years ago

      Oh, our world will be fine, it’s not the Earth’s first mass extinction event. We - and a lot of flora and fauna we depend on - are really fucked though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        It’s an interesting mass extinction event, too. Have we ever seen one species balloon to such predominance? Humans are like 80% of mammalian biomass on the planet. Definite loss of biodiversity. I wonder if it’s a loss of biomass too.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Hard to beat the dominance of archosaurs on Earth for about 180 mio years. Humans are a blink of an eye compared to that.

      • arefx
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Man we still fucked it all up though

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      Generally, overpopulation by an invasive species tends to ruin any habitat. We are just specially adept at it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            No, because hundreds of thousands of years of migrations led my ancestors elsewhere. That’s not what invasive means.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Redefine it to whatever suits you, humanity acts like an invasive species. Not sure why it offends you so much, but it says a lot about your capacity of critical thinking to get so emotional against introspection.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 years ago

                Lol yes if I’m not full on agent-from-the-matrix “humans are a virus” that means I’m a buffoon incapable of introspection. What’s definitely not the case? You are certainly not a jaded weirdo who isn’t particularly good with words and is looking to shit on humans as a species. Yep definitely not that.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  Never mind, if your previous comments hinted at it, this later comment has done a full reveal of it. Welcome to the block list.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 years ago

          I think they meant we’re from Central Africa and technically an invasive species anywhere else in the world.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 years ago

            I thought invasive implied a species was moved by another. I don’t think a species can be invasive just for moving north or something. Humans moved themselves gradually over time.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              42 years ago

              They adapted the definition to include causing economic or environmental harm because NERDS kept pointing out that all species are either constantly invading new territory or in the process of going extinct.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              42 years ago

              A quick search defines invasive species as a type of introduced species, which is outlined as

              An introduced species, alien species, exotic species, adventive species, immigrant species, foreign species, non-indigenous species, or non-native species is a species living outside its native distributional range, but which has arrived there by human activity, directly or indirectly, and either deliberately or accidentally.

              So I’d say that technically they are, but even more to the point it seems like the invasive species definition is very human centric (an alien cannot create an invasive species?)

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                42 years ago

                Obviously this is a super semantically oriented discussion but I don’t think it’s a stretch to say human in this context really refers more to the role. Humans can control other species in that way, like an extra terrestrial also likely could have.

                I’m not saying I agree with the idea, I’m just looking for a way humans could be “invasive”

      • Baut [she/her] auf.
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        “Overpopulation”? It’s infinite growth and inefficient distribution.
        Where do you think does the “overpopulation” come from?