Vuraniute to [email protected]English • 2 years agofixed cyberghost's "meme"thelemmy.clubimagemessage-square843fedilinkarrow-up1994
arrow-up1994imagefixed cyberghost's "meme"thelemmy.clubVuraniute to [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square843fedilink
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]linkfedilinkEnglish17•2 years agoWhat makes it morally justifiable in this case but not others?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•2 years agoThat it is benefiting those involved instead of being to their determent.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]linkfedilinkEnglish16•2 years agoIs benefiting others morally justifiable?
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]linkfedilinkEnglish17•2 years agoWhat is the moral justification for your answer?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•2 years agoIt’s actually axiomatic. I can’t really prove or justify why one should be good or bad, or why they should be good or bad to one another. But that good is good and to be strived for is the staring point of the philosophy.
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]linkfedilinkEnglish17•2 years agoThis is an appeal to the one true scotsman fallacy
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•2 years agoLook up axioms. You’ll see they are the staring points of logical arguments.
Not always but in this case
What makes it morally justifiable in this case but not others?
That it is benefiting those involved instead of being to their determent.
Is benefiting others morally justifiable?
Yes
What is the moral justification for your answer?
It’s actually axiomatic. I can’t really prove or justify why one should be good or bad, or why they should be good or bad to one another. But that good is good and to be strived for is the staring point of the philosophy.
This is an appeal to the one true scotsman fallacy
Look up axioms. You’ll see they are the staring points of logical arguments.