• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    112 years ago

    shelter is a human necessity. It is wrong to hoard shelter while there are people who have none.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Rental property owners don’t hoard shelter. The whole point is to provide housing to individuals and families.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        hoard (verb.)
        To accumulate money, food, or the like, in a hidden or carefully guarded place for preservation, future use, etc.

        Rental property owners don’t hoard shelter.

        I might be inclined to agree with you if landlords took out the locks and made those empty rental properties into interim homeless shelters, but we both know they would never do it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          02 years ago

          Rental properties aren’t hidden. There’s no cloak of invisibility spell surrounding them. So your definition doesn’t apply.

          Rental properties aren’t empty except during renovation or between tenants. So your second assertion also doesn’t apply.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Again, there’s no hoarding.

              The article you linked is misleading. Houses are vacant for various reasons. Some are temporarily vacant:

              • some are undergoing renovations
              • some are between tenants
              • some are for sale

              Some are more permanently vacant because they’re in such a state of disrepair that they can’t be lived in.

              Rental property owners rent out properties, which keeps people housed and off the streets. However there’s been a lack of housing development over the past decade in the United States which leads to a housing shortage.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                22 years ago

                Some are more permanently vacant because they’re in such a state of disrepair that they can’t be lived in.

                Gee, I wonder who’s responsibility it was to make sure that didn’t happen. ¯\(ツ)

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  22 years ago

                  The homeowners who let their house rot because they couldn’t afford to fix it or they just didn’t care? There’s been so many foreclosures that were blights on the neighborhood until investors bought them, fixed them up, and rented them to families who wanted a nice place to live.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        providing and selling are 2 different things (renting is just selling the limited use of something)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            42 years ago

            So every business is a provider in your eyes? You would say that McDonald’s provides food for everyone? That’s ridiculous and not the way anyone uses the word provide it’s just been brought into landlording to make leeches feel better about themselves

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              No, McDonald’s only provides food for those who choose to buy it. Not everyone eats at McDonald’s.

              Rental property owners aren’t leeches. Leeches are the tenants who use the service the landlord provides and don’t pay for it.