@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 2 years agoJust say 'No' to TERFs and tankies!lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square170fedilinkarrow-up1662
arrow-up1662imageJust say 'No' to TERFs and tankies!lemmy.dbzer0.com@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square170fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink38•2 years agoLook at how much they care about worker enfranchisement in the totalitarian regimes they idolise. They’re just red fascists.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•2 years agoFascist =/= authoritarian. People use the words interchangeably but they mean specific things. North Korea for example is authoritarian but not facist.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•2 years agoTankies tend to point to the USSR, China, and DPRK - I’d argue all of them fit Umberto Eco’s widely used definition of fascism pretty well. In this context, it’s a distinction without a difference. What difference does this even make?
Look at how much they care about worker enfranchisement in the totalitarian regimes they idolise.
They’re just red fascists.
Fascist =/= authoritarian.
People use the words interchangeably but they mean specific things. North Korea for example is authoritarian but not facist.
Tankies tend to point to the USSR, China, and DPRK - I’d argue all of them fit Umberto Eco’s widely used definition of fascism pretty well.
In this context, it’s a distinction without a difference. What difference does this even make?
I can’t address that because idk what they think about it.