False equivalency, considering one is (especially at the time) directly making the contemptibly gay-coded body language on the couch, hand gesture and all, while speaking poorly of the normalcy of the heteronormative thing that is supposed to be enjoyed.
Ow, the edge. It’s so dull because it hasn’t been sharpened since 2007.
You’re going this hard in defense of a webcomic cliche that was so thought-terminating that its own maker outright rejected it eventually. It shows what kind of people are still stanning for the original message: people like you.
False equivalency, considering one is (especially at the time) directly making the contemptibly gay-coded body language on the couch, hand gesture and all, while speaking poorly of the normalcy of the heteronormative thing that is supposed to be enjoyed.
Literally both of these characters are gay/effete coded.
Literally both a papercut and passing a kidney stone are painful.
Literally both a papercut and passing a kidney stone are painful.
Repeating your false equivalency doesn’t make it any less false.
removed by mod
Still doesn’t make your false equivalency less false. Just makes you sound like a homophobic Epic G!mer from the early 2000s.
Homophobia is when I call your mom effete. Which I did, because she is. And she’s gay. And she listens to all the worst cumtown clips.
Ow, the edge. It’s so dull because it hasn’t been sharpened since 2007.
You’re going this hard in defense of a webcomic cliche that was so thought-terminating that its own maker outright rejected it eventually. It shows what kind of people are still stanning for the original message: people like you.
Where did I defend the comic?
You’re seriously going into that smarmy Reddity angle of pedantically trying to dodge any and all liability for what you’ve already posted?
What was your point if you weren’t using your tiresome false equivalence from the very start to defend the comic?
Better yet, don’t answer. Your dull edgy nonsense is tiresome.