stopthatgirl7 to [email protected] • 2 years agoUS rejects AI copyright for famous state fair-winning Midjourney artarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square119fedilinkarrow-up1341cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1341external-linkUS rejects AI copyright for famous state fair-winning Midjourney artarstechnica.comstopthatgirl7 to [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square119fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareNotAPenguinlinkfedilink18•edit-22 years agoWhat about photographers? I don’t think “amount of work” is a good measurement for copyright, if you scribble something in 2 seconds on a piece of paper you still own the copyright, even if it’s not a great piece of art.
minus-squareNatanaellinkfedilinkEnglish6•2 years agoThe law is about human expression, not human work. That which a human expressed (with creative height) is protected, all else is not
What about photographers?
I don’t think “amount of work” is a good measurement for copyright, if you scribble something in 2 seconds on a piece of paper you still own the copyright, even if it’s not a great piece of art.
The law is about human expression, not human work. That which a human expressed (with creative height) is protected, all else is not