• Papamousse
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    It costs a lot of money, this money comes from your taxes, it affects your life

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        82 years ago

        Sixty million a year could build multiple public housing projects, every year. And on the other side of the balance scale is Charles.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            In fact, if Canada goes with a “President,” it would cost more. Just on the election alone, but then they will also need an enlarged staff for their political works. Also, electing a President has really been working out well elsewhere, like the USA, hasn’t it?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              We could have a President that is ceremonial like the Governor General now. Which means this hole thing would be pointless just to change the name of some position.

        • oʍʇǝuoǝnu
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          That’s maybe enough for one 100 unit building a year, depending on where it’s built, which is something but so far from anything substantial.

          Building is fucking expensive right now even if the province uses paramountcy to bypass municipal zoning. Plus, the province sucks ass at building compared to private because its gov’t. That’s not too say I don’t support massive amounts of public housing being built because I do 100%, but gov’t is gov’t.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          How is it costing us 60 million a year? Majority is Governor General. Well we still need that position it well just be named President of something. So don’t see how it well save any money.