• squiblet
    link
    fedilink
    78
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It’s something slightly different than hypocrisy. They’re not only criticizing people who choose to be vaccinated, which is hypocrisy, but the vaccine itself. It seems like a pretty fucked up political agenda to have, but what we’d expect from fox - be contrary, divide people just for the sake of profit and sowing discontent and confusion, and fuck the effects on the country. Or they actually want to harm the populace…

    • El Barto
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      What you’re describing is redundant… it’s like saying that not only you criticize people who use 5G, but the 5G tech itself.

      • squiblet
        link
        fedilink
        152 years ago

        Not precisely. Saying the vaccine isn’t effective or is dangerous can’t be hypocritical because they’re not a vaccine. Saying vaccine users made a bad decision isn’t even necessarily hypocritical because maybe they think they themselves did. Saying vaccinated people are sheep or unintelligent would be hypocritical because they’re vaccinated.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          Saying vaccinated people are sheep or unintelligent would be hypocritical

          Would it? I mean she works for Fox. That sounds like an accurate statement in her case.

      • squiblet
        link
        fedilink
        62 years ago

        It’s not clear whether that’s their intent or just a side effect.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          112 years ago

          Fox News was created by Roger Ailes after Nixon was impeached for this exact purpose. It is not a side effect.

          • squiblet
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            I meant whether harming the populace is a specific conscious goal.