randint to Programmer [email protected]English • 2 years agoAnd I thought that I had already seen the worst date format.i.vgy.meimagemessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1644
arrow-up1644imageAnd I thought that I had already seen the worst date format.i.vgy.merandint to Programmer [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square78fedilink
minus-squareKata1ystlinkfedilink16•2 years agoI hope you mean RFC 3339 instead of that non-authoritative ISO crap 😤
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•2 years agoYou mean the standard defined by The Internet Engineering Task Force? Of course I do! The ISO name is just more popular.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•2 years agoLove the smell of a good standards body fight in the morning (0900 GMT+0).
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•2 years agoAh! A Raccoon and/or Vegetable of culture! I tip my fedora to you and your one true time representation and storage system.
minus-squareSkull giverlinkfedilink15•2 years agoThe two overlap, but are not the same. Annoyingly, neither supports y-m-d h:i:s which is the format most pretend-ISO/RFC people like to use.
I hope you mean RFC 3339 instead of that non-authoritative ISO crap 😤
You mean the standard defined by The Internet Engineering Task Force? Of course I do! The ISO name is just more popular.
Love the smell of a good standards body fight in the morning (0900 GMT+0).
You mean 1694768400 in Unix timestamp?
Ah! A Raccoon and/or Vegetable of culture! I tip my fedora to you and your one true time representation and storage system.
tips debian
The two overlap, but are not the same.
Annoyingly, neither supports y-m-d h:i:s which is the format most pretend-ISO/RFC people like to use.
I am going to cry.