@[email protected] to Math [email protected]English • 2 years ago95.121% accuracyi.imgur.comimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1123cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1123image95.121% accuracyi.imgur.com@[email protected] to Math [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square14fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareCevilia (she/they/…)linkfedilinkEnglish14•2 years agoIt would be very easy to increase that to 100%, if you’re prepared to ignore enough data…
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish5•2 years agoActually it would approach 100% without ignoring data wouldn’t it?
minus-squareCevilia (she/they/…)linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoBut the only way it would actually get there depends on you, and your willingness to ignore data. :)
It would be very easy to increase that to 100%, if you’re prepared to ignore enough data…
Actually it would approach 100% without ignoring data wouldn’t it?
But the only way it would actually get there depends on you, and your willingness to ignore data. :)